🔗 Share this article

Tehran is ready to restart nuclear talks with the United States provided that it is treated with "dignity" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has announced.

Abbas Araghchi declared only diplomacy was effective, and shared fresh requests had been made by mediators to resume talks with the American leadership. He asserted Iran possessed no unreported enrichment locations, and Tehran was not yet able to allow the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.

Navigating a Complex Route

Araghchi is treading a challenging course since Iran does not want be seen to be operating from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful militarily and emotionally from the Israeli-US attack on its enrichment centers in June.

He was talking at a security conference in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material within its borders that it will always maintain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the previous talks.

Prior Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter conclusion on 12 June when Israel, with Washington's assistance, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with Donald Trump declaring the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations exercised their right to reinstate UN-wide sanctions, but Iran maintains they have not had a significant effect.

Magic Solution Suggested

Tehran representatives claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the nuclear fuel concern in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an local partnership with US participation could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be certain that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.

It had not been settled in the talks that American atomic experts could operate on Iranian soil, but that was a reasonable assumption of the partnership suggestion. Representatives stated three times they had achieved a deal with the US representative Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "detractors in America".

Existing Situation

Tehran representatives stated the partnership proposal was now off the table, but it seems very probable the offer could be reintroduced in some form if discussions reopen.

The American leader in recent days said he had been obtaining communications that Iran sought to restart talks, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining consistent overtures from Washington either explicitly or from significant local go-betweens, such as the Qatari government, the Egyptian leadership, Oman and Saudi Arabia. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of passivity in the wake of Trump's direct instinctive approach, but Iran asserts dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Standpoint

In his speech to the forum, aimed to paint the US as a hegemonic power that abuses the idea of worldwide standards, the foreign minister stated the fortnight-long engagement demonstrated the dispute could not be ended by combat operations. He stated the strikes commenced with a Washington's ultimatum for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is convinced the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust difficult to reestablish.

Negotiations Stays the Primary Solution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was America and the western countries that had always attempted to impose their desires during the discussions. Negotiations can still be viable and remains the final solution to resolve conflicts, but its requirements, guidelines and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"If they address to the citizens of Tehran with the language of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the same language."

Repair and Reconstruction

In what is portrayed by Iran's diplomats as the struggle of repair and recovery, Araghchi said he was assured Iran's defence capabilities "are much stronger than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been restored. We learned many lessons from this engagement; we have come to know our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the enemy."

He continued: "We successfully passed this conflict. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The installations and gear, if destroyed, will be rebuilt; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the unity of the country that they aimed at, but did not succeed to shatter. The nation of Iran have become more powerful, more united, and more supportive of the administration and the country in the aftermath of this assault."